212-227-8877
  • Attorneys
    • Joseph Tacopina
    • Chad Seigel
    • Matthew Deoreo
    • Eleonora Maria Lanzone
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Law
    • Civil Litigation
  • Notable Cases
  • Firm Overview
  • Featured Press
  • Media
    • TV Appearances
    • Radio Mentions
    • International Press
    • In The News
    • Thought Leadership

New Forensic Test in Homicide Investigations

By Joseph Tacopina Published June 24, 2013
Criminal Defense

Canadian police are using a new forensic test, stable isotope analysis, to determine where a homicide victim may have lived before death. Isotopes are variations of basic chemical elements and are deposited in hair and bone through food and water consumption.

This stable isotope analysis has been used in several European criminal investigations. Questions have been asked as to whether the technique has been used in the Suffolk County Gilgo Beach murder investigation, where a dozen murders over the course of 15 years remain unsolved.

Stable isotope analysis comes in when there is no other way to identify the murder victim, no family members or DNA. Based on what people eat and the water they consume, a variety of isotopes found in the decedent’s body can reveal whether there was sugar beet consumption, more prevalent in Europe, or more corn consumed, meaning that the victim was likely living in the United States. In addition, distribution rates of stable isotopes for hydrogen and oxygen can be mapped globally, which helps pinpoint a victim’s home.

In interviews with the New York City, Nassau County and Suffolk County police departments, the NYPD and Nassau police claim never to have used the technique. The Suffolk police avoided saying whether they are currently using the technique in the Gilgo investigation although they said it had not been used in any closed case.

A new technique’s reliability under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 depends on a number of factors, including whether:

  • The technique can be or has been tested
  • The technique has been subjected to peer review
  • The test procedures have been published
  • The test has a margin of error and, if so, at what rate
  • The technique, as applied, conformed to existing standards for the test.

Criminal defense attorneys with experience handling complex cases know to insist that the prosecution identify all use of scientific tests, including any new procedures. This ensures that they satisfy the requirements of Rule 702 and state evidentiary requirements.

footer footer-mobile

Let the best
in the business

defend you.

Call us for a free consultation 24/7

PHONE
212-227-8877
ADDRESS

275 Madison Avenue, 35th Floor,
New York, New York 10016

Background Image Background Image
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Law
    • Civil Litigation
  • Notable Cases
    • Notable Criminal Cases
    • Notable Civil Cases
  • Media
    • Thought Leadership
    • Featured Press
    • In The News
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • facebookFacebook
  • twitterTwitter
  • linkedinLinkedIn
  • instagramInstagram
  • lawyersLawyers.com

Tacopina Seigel & DeOreo is located in New York, NY and serves clients in and around New York, Long Island City, Sunnyside, Astoria, Brooklyn, Woodside, Maspeth, Middle Village, Jackson Heights, Elmhurst, Ridgewood, East Elmhurst, Bronx, Rego Park, Corona, Forest Hills, Woodhaven, College Point, Ozone Park, Jamaica, Howard Beach, Bronx County, Kings County, New York County and Queens County.

Attorney Advertising. This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. [ Do Not Sell My Personal Information ]

© 2025 Tacopina Seigel Trial Lawyers
Design by SPINX Digital