212-227-8877
  • Attorneys
    • Joseph Tacopina
    • Chad Seigel
    • Matthew Deoreo
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Law
    • Civil Litigation
  • Notable Cases
  • Firm Overview
  • Featured Articles
  • Media
    • TV Appearances
    • Radio Mentions
    • International Press
    • In The News
    • Thought Leadership

Challenging the Condominium Association That Tried to Ban Judaism at the Door

By Joseph Tacopina Published March 5, 2013
Civil Litigation
Tags: banning Jewish Mezuzah by condo association, condominium association by-laws, Conodominium Act, NY civil litigation lawyers

This past April a Connecticut condominium association reversed its decision to prohibit Mezuzahs on the doorposts of residents’ apartments. A Mezuzah is a Jewish religious article in the shape of a small rectangle, which contains sacred parchment and is affixed to the doorpost.

The Association had earlier threatened a Jewish resident, Barbara Cadranel with a $50 a day fine until she removed a mezuzah from her doorpost. The dispute became national news, Cadranel threatened to sue and now the condo association has backed down. The ban, had it been enforced, raised interesting First Amendment and equal protection issues. The association allowed residents to display items on doors such as Christmas wreaths and crucifixes, but Jewish residents could not affix mezuzahs to their doorposts.

The legal relationship between the condo association, typically represented by its Boards of Managers, and the condo’s residents is governed by Article 9-B of the Real Property Law, more commonly known as the Condominium Act. The Condominium Act requires the by-laws to contain protections of the common interests of unit owners and board members. For example the act prohibits a rule or bylaw which puts an unreasonable restraint on alienation. The board then can’t sell common areas without the knowledge and consent of the unit owners. On the other hand the act contains provisions allowing the board to obtain injunctive relief to collect unpaid financial obligations.

Individual unit owners still must comply strictly with the bylaws, regulations, resolutions, and decisions of the condominium Boards of Managers. However, the Board itself must follow the condominium’s own declaration, bylaws or internal rules and regulations. It must also exercise prudent business judgment in making decisions, just like any other corporate board of directors.

Like the Connecticut condo’s association learned after their short lived attempt to ban the Jewish Mezuzah, the legal rights and responsibilities of all parties still remain subject to federal law guaranteeing equal protection and freedom of religion.

footer footer-mobile

Let the best
in the business

defend you.

Call us for a free consultation 24/7

PHONE
212-227-8877
ADDRESS

275 Madison Avenue, 35th Floor,
New York, New York 10016

Background Image Background Image
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Law
    • Civil Litigation
  • Notable Cases
    • Notable Criminal Cases
    • Notable Civil Cases
  • Media
    • Thought Leadership
    • Featured Articles
    • In The News
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • facebookFacebook
  • twitterTwitter
  • linkedinLinkedIn
  • instagramInstagram
  • lawyersLawyers.com

Tacopina Seigel & DeOreo is located in New York, NY and serves clients in and around New York, Long Island City, Sunnyside, Astoria, Brooklyn, Woodside, Maspeth, Middle Village, Jackson Heights, Elmhurst, Ridgewood, East Elmhurst, Bronx, Rego Park, Corona, Forest Hills, Woodhaven, College Point, Ozone Park, Jamaica, Howard Beach, Bronx County, Kings County, New York County and Queens County.

Attorney Advertising. This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. [ Do Not Sell My Personal Information ]

© 2023 Tacopina Seigel Trial Lawyers
Design by SPINX Digital